HOLLIE GREIG THE QUESTIONS

when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police to question the alleged perpetrators without delay;


when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police immediately to search the homes of those named for corroborative evidence;



when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to seize and examine the computers of those named at the earliest opportunity;


when allegations of rape are supported by evidence from well-respected medical and psychological experts who unanimously confirm not only that systematic abuse has taken place, but go so far as to name two of the most likely perpetrators, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe it right to dismiss their testimony and allow those named to leave the country;


when a school doctor twice reports an under-age girl to be at risk, and that girl’s headmaster - one of those subsequently named as a serial rapist - consistently fails to alert the child’s mother or to take any steps to protect her, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe this to be the normal behaviour of a responsible, and guiltless, person;


when a case of rape is reported by a girl with speech difficulties, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to supply her with support during police interviews, but are happy to use her handicap, in this respect, to discredit her spoken evidence;


when a case of repeated multiple gang rape over many years is reported by a young girl who also names seven fellow victims, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe that, in view of the Scottish law regarding corroboration, it is absolutely essential that the police question those she has named immediately.


When an acknowledged victim of rape receives a substantial award from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, you, as representative of the Crown Office, feel justified in continuing to maintain that the allegations on which this award was based were fully investigated and found to be false.

HOAXER TALK

HOAXER TALK


We believe, beyond reasonable doubt, that Hollie Greig was abused and has been badly let down by the Scottish justice system and that this same system has treated Robert Green disgracefully.We are very angry and upset that the words and actions of a number of misguided people who think of themselves as supporters of Hollie and Robert, have created the present situation where this gravely serious case has been reduced to a farce.


Sarah McLeod



JUST WEEKS LATER


MCLEOD WAS SAYING IT WAS A HOAX

Mar 10

Sarah McLeod you are quite correct Danny, the evidence was never there to start with and the story
was used to appeal to people on a visceral
level, both of the HG case and now the
Hampstead one. Have you ever tried
appealing to BGs sensible side about
either cases?

Friday, 14 February 2014

ROBERT GREEN LATEST

As Ima understand it Robert was not called in court today so that means they be holding Robert either in Queens St or Bucksburn cells, obviously Robert will be up in court on the 17th but really other than that could it be the majistrates public which Ima doubt very much when they will rather have a sheriff in the crown affirm some dodgy date for trial but in saying that they wunni with hold Robert right? hhmm the whole kidnapping like Nazi Gestapo's is ever so real they just wunni knock Robert about like any Adam for reason being they are scared sh1tless as it is to have re-arrested Robert only has no other than for the reason of muzzling Robert once again

HOAX MY FKN * EH !!

Please be at court to support Robert on Monday the 17th if you can personally Ima canni make it until after 11 prolly closer 11:30am
Unless they held some dodgy star chamber after hrs

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post a Comment